your gpa is a 4.0? That's Nice, But it’s Not As special as you might think.

In recent years, I’ve had many versions of the same conversation with parents, and it goes something like this: “Danny is on the varsity basketball team, he’s also active in robotics and has a GPA of 4.2. He hasn’t taken the SAT or ACT yet, but our school list includes Duke, Penn, Michigan, and schools like that. What do you think?”

I feel like the proverbial storm cloud at the pool party when I rain on their parade. I know that I have to manage their expectations by placing Danny’s GPA in context, and I understand parents’ confusion, because it wasn’t long ago that a 4.0 was a really big deal. Today, the truth is that straight As don’t mean what they used to mean. Gone are the days when a 4.0 (or better) really distinguished you from the pack.

Grade inflation is a national epidemic; the number of students with all or mostly all As in high schools across the country has skyrocketed. In a recent article, Jed Applerouth of Applerouth.com addressed this topic, the reasons for it, and its implications. I can’t do Jed’s research justice, so I highly encourage you to read his article, which can be found here: https://www.applerouth.com/blog/the-ongoing-high-cost-of-grade-inflation. While the reasons for this phenomenon can be discussed elsewhere, the consequences include a loss of distinction in the application pool and lack of predictive power regarding success in college.

It’s no great secret that colleges are bringing back standardized testing requirements, and grade inflation is no small reason why. In essence, having all As doesn’t tell colleges much about students’ actual academic abilities (which, according to studies, have been falling while grades have been rising!). Colleges need another metric, and standardized tests are one such metric. Furthermore, the tests seem to better predict actual success in college than do high school GPAs.

Personally, I don’t believe we are doing students any favors by handing out As like party favors. It confuses them about their true knowledge of a subject and ill-prepares them for the academic rigor of college. Most importantly for the purposes of this blog, it doesn’t lower college application pressure! Now, students have to find even more ways to distinguish themselves. While having As might not be the golden ticket, not having them looks worse than ever (since they’re easier to come by), so getting excellent grades in AP classes is de rigueur. Tests are back, so students had better do well on them too. And, finally, students really need to get creative and industrious about their work, volunteer, and extracurricular activities. Phew - that’s a lot!

I work hard with students to come up with outside activities that can help distinguish them from their peers. Yet, I also encourage them to remain true to themselves - don’t just take on an activity because you think it will look good - do it because you are actually interested in it! In addition, I remind students of the importance of discernment: learning what you don’t want to do is critical, so use time out of school wisely to explore potential interests. Activities don’t need to be school-sponsored, either. With a little ingenuity and grit, students can carve out activities that complement their skill and interest sets. Not everyone should start a nonprofit, just as not everyone should play a team sport. There is no tried and true recipe - that’s the bad and the good news here.

Finally, parents and students need to manage their expectations appropriately. There really is a school for every student, so keep an open mind and look beyond the “usual suspects.” It’s more competitive than ever out there, despite the deluge of As raining down on students, so make sure to think of your application preparation holistically. A 4.2 GPA may allow you to join the conversation, but the entirety of your application will get you invited to the party.

My Thoughts on a Recent U.S. News Article

We all know U.S. News, and most of us in higher education have a love/hate relationship with the publication. I have been a contributing expert to it on several occasions, so I mean it when I say that I find myself in the odd position of advising applicants not to believe everything you read from the purported experts!

In the article Worst Advice Ever Given to Law School Applicants” (https://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-law-schools/applying/articles/worst-advice-ever-given-to-law-school-applicants; January 16, 2025), Anayat Durrani outlines bad advice given to would-be law students. While I wholeheartedly agree with most of the statements made by those interviewed, I write to take issue with the first item covered: “Myth: There’s No Harm in Retaking the LSAT.”

The first “expert” interviewed states “While retaking the LSAT can improve your score, it’s far from risk-free. Law schools often see all of your scores, and some may average them or consider multiple attempts as a lack of preparedness.” Okay, first, law schools see all of your scores taken within five years of applying. If you cancel a score, they see that too (and nobody cancels a good score). Second, the vast majority of law schools no longer average scores. That practice was done away with quite a long time ago. Think of it this way - law schools are incentivized to give you credit for the highest score, as that is the number they will report out to the ABA and on which their rankings will hang. Simply put, do not worry about them averaging your scores!

Another “expert” says “Retaking the test also means you're likely to submit your application later. And since most law schools use rolling admissions – reviewing applications as they're received – ‘retaking the LSAT may impact negatively on the timing of action on your application’.” While the person has a point in that retaking the LSAT might cause you to apply later in the cycle, I disagree with the implications of this statement. Yes, most law schools work on a rolling admissions cycle and, yes, applying earlier in that cycle is to your advantage … within limits. I tell my clients that I would rather see them apply in December with a 165 than in September with a 155. Sometimes earlier isn’t better, it’s just earlier. At the end of the day, law schools want to see a higher number, so you are better off retaking the LSAT and applying a little later with the higher score. That is, of course, as long as you are not applying really late in the cycle. If that’s the case, you should still retake the test and apply in the following year’s cycle with the higher LSAT score.

I’ve advised thousands of law school applicants, and over 90% of them have taken the LSAT more than once. It is a tricky, three-headed monster of a test, and it’s very common for applicants to need to revise their test prep strategy and preparation methods. If there is more than a four point gap in scores, I advise writing a very brief explanatory addendum to schools outlining the reason(s) for the score increase.

As with many things, the law of diminishing returns applies and there comes a time when an applicant has hit his or her personal ceiling on the test. In that case, it’s futile to keep going back to the well. But, as in many of the cases I’ve seen, it behooves the client to retake the LSAT. The difference in scores could very well be the difference in where they are accepted. And, one final thing, merit money often chases the LSAT. So, if an applicant is hoping for merit awards from schools (as most are), it is in their best interest to retake the LSAT if they have a reasonable belief that they can score higher.

The Legal Employment Market is Hot, Hot, Hot!

For those of you who graduated from law school in 2021, you entered one of the strongest legal job markets in recent history (class of 2022 data is not yet available). The National Association of Law Placement (NALP) recently released its findings, and they looked amazing. For those graduating in 2022, and 2023, the market also looks promising.

So … what about the next round of applicants, who would graduate in 2024 or after? Well, there’s some indication that we might be at the top of the curve (think bell curve) and that the numbers might stay the same or go down a little bit, but I’ve been doing this since 2008 and think that law school remains an excellent proposition. Even when the bottom dropped out in 2010 and 2011, my students were getting jobs. Good jobs.

If you’d like to read the entire NALP report, you can find it here: https://www.nalp.org/classof2021. As always, please reach out with any questions about the law school admissions process.

Applicants: Clean Up Your Social Media Presence!

I feel like a broken record on this point, but I think this is a message worth repeating: be careful about what you post on social media sites! Schools can - and sometimes will - review a student’s social media posts if they have questions or concerns. When you choose to put it out there you forfeit any purported right to privacy. Period.

I’ve spoken before about Harvard University’s 2017 decision to rescind the acceptances of 10 students for offensive Facebook posts (https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2017/06/06/531591202/harvard-rescinds-admission-of-10-students-over-obscene-facebook-messages). Well, Marquette University has just rescinded an athletic recruit’s acceptance and scholarship for a racist (and highly disturbing) Snapchat post regarding the George Floyd tragedy. (https://www.tmj4.com/news/local-news/marquette-university-rescinds-recruits-admission-scholarship-over-george-floyd-snapchat-post). Like all decent people around the country - and the world - I’m furious and heartbroken over Mr. Floyd’s murder and the systemic racial problems that plague our nation. And, like Marquette University, I’m horrified by the student’s post.

This is an extreme example, to be certain, and I definitely do not believe that most young people share this student’s sentiments regarding the treatment of Mr. Floyd. Yet, I reference it to underscore the point that social media posts have consequences: in college - in employment - in life. Do not be fooled by the notion that posts on sites like Instagram and Snapchat are somehow temporary. Once posted, your words, pictures, and thoughts will remain forever in the information underground. Even if a post is the result of carelessness (rather than something more malignant) it can indicate a lack of good judgment, and good judgment really matters. Colleges are looking for character and judgment in addition to scholarship, talent, and ability. As well they should be! In the span of four short years you will go from applicant to alum and, as such, you will be an ambassador for their institution, their mission and their values.

I genuinely believe that most people have good hearts and intentions. Having said that, your social media presence is akin to your fingerprint. What do you want it to say about you?

Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste ....

We’re all wondering what will happen this fall. While updates stream in on a daily basis, my crystal ball remains broken. If the medical and public health experts are unable to make definite predictions at this time, suffice it to say that I know better than to venture into that jungle. I can, however, share some examples of innovation from several colleges around the nation (there are countless more!) along with some personal perspective.

Rahm Emmanuel is often credited with coining the phrase “never allow a good crisis (to) go to waste.” The authors of the Yale Book of Modern Proverbs posit that it can be traced to one M.F. Weiner, who used the term in 1976 in the journal Medical Economics. Regardless of who first said it, the sentiment could never be more relevant than it is right now. It’s times like these that bring out not only the worst - but also the best - in us. We innovate, we collaborate, we … “build a better mousetrap …” (we’re pretty sure Ralph Waldo Emerson said that last one). Let’s talk about a few recent examples.

UC San Diego recently revealed its Return to Learn Program, a phased initiative that begins this month with the 5,000+ students still residing on campus. Participants will self-test for COVID-19 with provided kits. If a participant tests positive, he/she will be notified and advised to seek medical attention. Efforts will also be made to track and notify individuals who were in contact with the infected participant. Isolation housing will be provided and steps are being taken to maximize the privacy of participants. If successful, this program will be scaled to accommodate the 65,000+ people who will, hopefully, converge on the campus come fall. https://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/introducing-the-uc-san-diego-return-to-learn-program

The University of Miami’s president , Julio Frenk, recently outlined a four pillar plan to reopen campus for in-person instruction for the Fall 2020 term. https://www.themiamihurricane.com/2020/05/04/president-frenk-outlines-his-plan-for-a-return-this-fall-2/ Dr. Frenk, a former executive director at the World Heath Organization and former dean of Harvard’s Chan School of Public Health, stated that his plan includes provisions for testing, tracing, separating and, finally, vaccinating (when available). “We just need to coexist with this virus and adapt” said Frenk. While he is closely monitoring the spread of the virus throughout the country, he went on to state “(a)t this point, it would take something really very dramatic, which I do not envision, for us not to open in the fall.” UM has stated that it would give students and their families a definitive answer about the fall semester in June.

At the University of Pennsylvania, they’re training COVID-19 sniffing dogs! In April, a pilot program was kicked off using scent detection dogs to differentiate between COVID-19 positive and negative patients. The U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center will soon be joining Penn in this endeavor. As a proud Penn alumna, I cannot resist saying Go Quakers and Quaker Pups! https://powerofpenn.upenn.edu/new-priorities-at-penn-vet/

Will all colleges open in the fall? Will any? It’s still a little too soon to know, but it’s very unlikely that there will be a one-size-fits-all response to this pandemic. This is because each college and university must respond to its individual environment and ecosystem. A small, rural school, for example, may have an advantage over an urban research university when it comes to social distancing, thereby keeping outbreaks at bay. Having said that, the urban research university may have at its disposal health care workers and hospitals, quickly coming to the aid of infected students. It’s incumbent upon all of us to look at this situation on both a macro and micro level and to educate ourselves about what’s happening at the particular schools we attend or are considering attending.

With rising death tolls and collapsing economies, it’s easy to become pessimistic about our current state of affairs. I don’t diminish the enormity of these problems or the suffering endured by their many casualties. Having said that, I’m hopeful when I read what people are trying to do. The above are but three of the many examples I’ve recently come across that show the ingenuity, tenacity and determination at work on college campuses across our nation. We send our students to college to create - to innovate - to challenge. It’s heartening to see that we’re entrusting them to educators who lead by example.